This article weaves an intricate portrait of a young Islamic
man by the name of Mohamed Ahmed. The writer appears to remain out of the
profile, only a presence which Ahmed acknowledges through the soft-spoken
truths said to this invisible narrator, reflecting on the past and considering
himself as a split person. Ahmed is a Muslim teenager in America who has found
it to be a unique struggle to fit in amongst his peers, who despite making him
feel welcome, have almost polar opposite values and lifestyles. He is torn
between his Koran-taught values and the culture he finds himself a part of.
Though depicting a frustrating confliction within this
typical Muslim teenager, the article has some hopeful meaning emanating from
some of its less obvious details. Yes, Mohamed feels regret and even guilt for
some of his past experiences, possibly due in part to his strict upbringing
from his more traditionally Muslim parents – but a majority of the article
describes a boy who is accepted and cared for as a friend and respected as a
talented student. He was even valedictorian. When I read this article, I
acknowledged the difficulties Mohamed faced, but also felt happy for his
achievements both socially and academically. It was comforting for me to know that
individuals varying in their principles and values can have such success in the
same fields of education. Hopefully we will continue on the path of embracing
cultural differences and maintain the respect needed for them to exist as
freely and unrestricted as possible.
Whatever can be done for teenager’s like Mohamed to feel
welcome and safe to explore their religious boundaries, without accidents like
he had with his friend Michelle happening, should be exploited. Mohamed even
said himself that after 9/11, people around him in America knew nothing more
about Islam than what was told to them in news broadcasts. An example of what
might work to help occurred yesterday, at UTM. It was Muslim Awareness day,
where held in the CCIT building were exhibits of art, culture and information about
things people might actually be afraid to ask about. The better people
understand one another’s values, the less people seem like the “other” and the
better it is to work and play more fluidly. This doesn’t just concern people of
different religious backgrounds - it also can be applied to issues concerning
race, gender identity, sexuality, the mentally/physically challenged and more. There
is a broader lesson to be learned here.
The article was well-written and informative. I have to
admit one point that stood out to me, a guideline of Mohamed’s parents, and I found
it particularly unfavourable. It was a request for him to only be surrounded by
and be friends with other Muslim children at his school. I think that is potentially
a dangerous notion of a lingering, harmful separatism. Mohamed’s different
relationships and experiences during his academic years will help him
indefinitely in whatever career path he chooses, where he will have to be in a
similar environment to what high school and university/college simulated for
him. I am aware should people be
separate by choice, or because they are most comfortable that way (Mohamed had
trouble relating to some of his non-Muslim friends), it won’t necessarily hurt
anyone. But what it might hurt is the functionality of a multicultural society
that only works for the benefit of all when relationships and communication are
fostered among the rich variety of people who are a part of it. Love thy
neighbour, am I right?
No comments:
Post a Comment